Building
Green, clean and fresh – WC without the flushObjectives
- Provide some alternative solutions, such as transformation of toilets with septic tanks into dry toilets, including recycling of brown, yellow and grey water.
Green Value indicator
- CO2 savings
- Eco footprint
- Energy intensity
- Water Consumption by Sector
- Water abstraction rates and water stress
According to Sustainable Sanitation Alliance (SuSanA), “to qualify as sustainable sanitation, a sanitation system has to be economically viable, socially acceptable, technically and institutionally appropriate, and protect the environment and natural resources.”
Explanation
In today’s world, you can get a flush restroom experience practically in every office building (although, according to “The United Nations world water development report 2015”, 35,8 % of the world’s population still lacks access to any proper sanitation facilities). However, conventional sanitation systems have their limitations - standard flush toilets are very energy intensive (the use of clean water for the flushing of toilets is the largest form of water waste in domestic consumption and it is estimated that human beings flush away approximately 70 litres of freshwater per person per day through toilet use (Branstrator, 2014; Zaied, 2018)) and have a negative environmental impact.There are three main reasons to use dry toilets instead of flush ones:
- to reduce water consumption and water waste;
- to prevent the contamination and pollution of surface water, groundwater (potentially affecting drinking water quality), and soil;
- to enable reuse of the human excreta and wastewater as a soil conditioner and fertilizer.
Some practical actions to stimulate the transformation to dry toilets:
- provide general information about sustainable sanitation – benefits of dry toilets for both the environment and human health, as well as how to use them, how they look and that they don’t smell;
- raise awareness on the importance of using dry sanitation systems to reduce water usage through promotional campaigns;
- get informed about the dry toilet producers in your local area and contact them – explore the possibilities of transforming the sanitation system in your office.
PROS/CONS of the action
Pros:- positive environmental and health effects
- reducing the inefficiency, expensiveness and energy intensity of the widely used flush sanitation systems
- lower water consumption and significantly lower bills in the long term – low operating costs
- generating demand for greener products and services
- more planning and potential higher costs at the start of the investment (although in the long term, costs related to dry toilets are significantly lower than the flush ones)
- tackling socio-cultural perceptions and prejudices about handling the human excreta and social representation of dry toilets
- no standard guidelines on dry toilets
Certified
Not CertifiedLink to useful sources
Making composting toilets desirable: Tackling resistance to sustainable sanitation practices https://www.lse.ac.uk/Demonstration of a new biocide dry toilet with improved functionalities for three specific markets https://cordis.europa.eu
The world needs more toilets – but not ones that flush https://theconversation.com
World Toilet Day https://www.worldtoiletday.info/
KAKIS positive sanitation - introduction video https://youtu.be/Rnk20TQ3SlM
Resource management sanitation https://cgi.tu-harburg.de
Sustainable Sanitation Alliance https://www.susana.org
How Gray Water Reclamation Works https://science.howstuffworks.com